Welcome to Mobilarian Forum - Official Symbianize.

[Shatana]

True them destroying art is kinda sad and annoying, but that's how activism/rallys work. people need to disrupt the peace in order to force the hand of those in power

 

[K@zuki]

Although may protective barrier naman yung mga painting na binabato nila, mali pa din yung way nila ng pag protesta, or possible din naman na napagodnna sila kasi walang action na ginagawa sa mga hinaing nila kaya yan na next resort nila

 

[Demoniel200]

may ibang way naman siguro para mag protest, dapat hindi na nila dinamay yung art sayang yung effort ng mga artist na gumawa

 

[zhanglx]

I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.

There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.

There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.

According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.

But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?

I personally think it is dumb but it sure does attract attention

 

[Kyan29]

may ibang way ng pag proprotest

 

[Tetra]

I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.

There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.

There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.

According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.

But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?

Pointless, entirely pointless, if that's how they deliver their message then its not the correct way, to be an activists means that u should speak up without harming any other precious things