Welcome to Katz - Pinoy Underground Forum

[ashiirogi]

I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.

There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.

There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.

According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.

But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?

 

[throwslow1]

I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.

There have been news and v_ide_o.s of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.

There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.

According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.

But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?

Nope. Its not justified. But i still would respect them for having the balls.

 

[elbandit0]

I wouldnt of course agree if they did say art is nothing. but the fact that they are using art to demonstrate or to send a message out there then they are kinda contradicting themselves as it doesnt make sense to use something that has a value of nothing to blackmail or get attention. I guess their purpose was just to get media/peoples attention and they have definitely got it.

 

[daddyg9067]

Not a justification sa pinaglalaban nila.

 

[mgaloserjakolero]

I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.

There have been news and v_ide_o.s of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.

There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.

According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.

But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?

I don’t care about them at all. They’ll be sent to prison.

 

[p6rzival]

pede naman silang magprotest ng ibang way bat pa nila kailangan siraain yung art

 

[katzwhat]

its not justified but it's smart of them to do something this controversial because they have attention now

 

[sevethhigh17]

There’s another way of doing this instead of thrashing other peoples’ hard work.