B
0
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 8
- Location
- Quezon City
- grants
- ₲177
3 years of service
not enough to justify para sa ginawa nila sa paintings
sa akin lang is di sila pinapakinggan ng mga tao kaya ginawa nila yon. ang gusto lang kase ng tao ngayon is trabaho ket pa mapolluted ang EarthI haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.
There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.
There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.
According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.
But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?
kulang sa pansin mga yan. gusto lng magpa viral magtiktok na lang sila bka mapansin pa.I haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.
There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.
There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.
According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.
But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?
May point ka po bossI haven't seen anyone post about this yet, so I'm curious all of you think.
There have been news and videos of Environment activist throwing paint all over important paintings and gluing themselves on the wall.
There is basically saying that, art is nothing is the earth is dead and demonstrates how people would react more on destroyed art rather than on environmental problems that are actually ruining the earth.
According to some articles I've read it seems like the paintings weren't actually ruined, they had plastic covers on them, the activist just wanted to do a demonstration I guess.
But if ever they did destroy important art, do you think they are justified in doing that as a propaganda? Or are they just going to be seen as crazy like any other extremist activists? What are your thoughts on this?