Welcome to Mobilarian Forum - Official Symbianize forum.

[relotte]

Counter picking someone can be detrimental and can often lead to snowballing them so bad that you put them out of the game for good. You see this a lot with champions like Xerath mid who can really wreck a team 1v5 but not if they have to lane vs a good fizz or zed player early game.

However, counterpicking someone just for the sake of champion advantage when you have no experience on the champion is awful and can have quite the opposite effect.

For example, Morgana can be seen as a counter to pyke in some ways. But its a counter with a very clear weakness towards pyke as well. Morganas spell shield has a 20+ second cooldown while pykes q is half that. Experienced pyke players will actually find a morgana lane to be very easy if the morgana is inexperienced.

As a rule of thumb especially in low elo, a counterpick isnt really a counterpick if you never play the champion. Just stick to what you know, even if you are disadvantaged slightly.

Great advice, pick 2-4 champions that you're confident in, instead of champions who're counter picks but you don't have experiences on.

 

[quangphu.qnvn1]

i always pick champ i know very well ( so that's why I could not play all the champ)

 

[monke12]

true. although, counter picking is still a very good option. especially if you have a good sense in the game. you can probably play through it first time. pero mas safe na mag practice

 

[lunaticshadow]

mag try champ sa rank tapos sisihin kakampi ganun sa low elo

 

[soulsaver]

thanks for info bro

 

[maumeister]

totoo to! Pag malakas kalaban i always use my main

 

[Eigengrau23]

Agreed. Iba parin pag komportable ka gamitin yung champion

 

[cgb1880]

Vv true
More knowledge = evening the odds. I saw someone na naka triple kill gamit sona